The 'right to be forgotten' while very real, it is the least actual used case of GDPR. Instead, for legal reasons, you would still have to join 'a person' (e.g. email) to 'a crypto wallet' to collect consent for the data sharing needed, required and optional. (which is what 99% of those annoying GDPR prompts are for when browsing online)…
The 'right to be forgotten' while very real, it is the least actual used case of GDPR. Instead, for legal reasons, you would still have to join 'a person' (e.g. email) to 'a crypto wallet' to collect consent for the data sharing needed, required and optional. (which is what 99% of those annoying GDPR prompts are for when browsing online) And that consent would have to be captured and timestamped on chain + also on off chain tables, In essence as the controller, even asking consent also makes you go the same road to verify the link between person and wallets.
The 'right to be forgotten' while very real, it is the least actual used case of GDPR. Instead, for legal reasons, you would still have to join 'a person' (e.g. email) to 'a crypto wallet' to collect consent for the data sharing needed, required and optional. (which is what 99% of those annoying GDPR prompts are for when browsing online) And that consent would have to be captured and timestamped on chain + also on off chain tables, In essence as the controller, even asking consent also makes you go the same road to verify the link between person and wallets.